"A nation, or even a planet, that recognizes no god other than its belly will quickly start wallowing in the ignorance, crime, corruption, and avarice that today afflicts the United States, and it will find itself unable to free itself of them." ~ Samuel T. Francis

Samuel Francis popularized the term Stupid Party for the Republicans in the early 1990s in this country. He's the guy who was fired by the Washington Times in 1995 for being too white, er, right. He had the audacity of hope of attending the first American Renaissance Conference in 1994, thinking he could spark something among the Sleepwalkers (whites). I very much enjoyed his speech (short excerpt here) at the 1996 AmRen conference at the elegant Seelbach Hotel in Louisville.

And what he has written & said has been amazingly prescient, but establishment Stupid-Party Republicans didn't want to believe it then. Or now.

This has prompted Mark Levin's big announcement about being "an inch" from leaving the Republican Party by its cowardice in not opposing the bold Obama amnesty, which is clearly against the interest of whites. Are you a racially conscious white person? Probably not.

Hispanics? Yes. The Race, baby. Blacks? You betcha. Black pride is celebrated. What do you think this made-up, racist Kwanzaa is all about? (The late Tony Snow was mild-mannered and moderate but becomes hard-edged on this issue, doncha think?) Whites? Not yet. Give us time, though, once we've figured out how badly we're screwed, a besieged minority in our own country we largely built and directed. Just wait. The pendulum will swing--there is indeed "a tide in the affairs of men." I'll be the moderate then.

They, the mass of whites who are without racial consciousness or pride, are afraid of racial realities and shy away from a realistic portrayal of such issues, though occasionally events can't be ignored, such as OJ Simpson's acquittal, Ferguson, the prominence of Al Sharpton, Detroit, black crime, etc.

One commenter says something truthful about the impassioned Levin cri de coeur--though it doesn't go quite far enough into the brutally bleak multicultural future of the USA that Francis's great friend Jared Taylor sees so clearly.

Thoughts On A Sunday

| | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0)
It's been a quiet weekend here at The Manse, with BeezleBub at the WP In-Laws and Deb having returned to work after a six-week medical leave.

About the most exciting thing I did this weekend was to order a DVD/Blu-ray copy of A Christmas Carol with George C. Scott. Our VHS copy was getting a bit ratty and I didn't know how much longer our VHS deck would continue to operate, so I figured it was time to get a replacement. We watch it every Christmas Eve, a part of our family Christmas tradition. Frankly, I've long believed Scott's portrayal of Scrooge was one of the best I've ever seen.


I don't think we're going to have to worry about a white Christmas this year unless we get a long stretch of warm weather or a lot of rain between now and then. Considering we've had snowcover since the two days before Thanksgiving, more snow earlier this week, and on again/off again snow flurries just about every day, I think it's a safe bet there will be snow for Christmas.


As if I needed a scientific study to know this.

A study proves high-heels do have power over men. I know I've always liked women in heels.


It's not surprising to me and many others that the UVA gang-rape story has fallen apart.

Frankly, it sounded too good to be true, at least in regards to how it served the feminist "rape culture" narrative. That there were no reports or criminal investigations in regards to such a brutal gang-rape made me skeptical. I had grave doubts that the alleged victim's 'friends' would convince her not to go to a hospital or report the assault to the police. Either it was made up or her friends weren't really friends at all. Who does that kind of thing to a brutalized friend?


Here's yet another piece that ties in with my piece about the madness infecting the Obama Administration and the rest of the Progressive movement in the US.

Gee, who knew that Mitt Romney was right? I certainly did.


Then there's this take on the Madness Of King Leftist from The Camp Of The Saints.

He is, once again, delusional; he is self-deceiving, mentally disturbed.

When such a person and his fellow self-deceivers gain Power And Control, they end-up bringing about pain and suffering and misery and Death.

The Leftist Way Of Thinking now dominates in America. And America is sliding into enslavement.

Soon, of we do not vanquish Leftism from this land, we will find ourselves prisoners of madmen.



Cap'n Teach links to and comments upon the seven psychological reasons why we aren't tackling Hotcoldwetdry.

Teach adds a few of his own:

Why should I take action when Warmists won't in their own lives?

Why should we take action when 95% of computer models have failed?

Why should we destroy economies and hand over our liberty based on junk science, emotionally based arguments, and disingenuous data?

I have to correct Cap'n Teach's second point: 100% of the computer models have failed. Not one has correctly predicted the 18+ year pause, nor has one correctly hindcast global temperatures, telling us the models are seriously deficient.


From the "This Would Be Funny If It Weren't True" files comes this from the Rumford (Maine) Meteor:

Bangor Winter Carnival Cancelled Because Of Winter.

One slightly more ironic headline under the same heading:

Common Core Prepares Students For Lucrative Future In Fields That Require Sitting On The Floor And Expressing Your Opinion About Addition.



Bird Dog answers ten questions that have been bugging all of us for years.

It's about time.


How much White Privilege Do You Have?

As much as I can grab in order to piss off those who are so obsessed with White Priviliege. That's how much I have.



Talk about cutting your nose off to spite your face!

One problem New England has had for some time is the lack of natural gas pipeline capacity. That has led to a roller coaster of prices for both gas and electricity. As the demand for gas goes up in the winter, the price of both natural gas and electricity skyrockets. This is because the supply cannot meet the demand, mostly because of that lack of pipeline capacity. The gas prices affect electricity prices because there have been quite a few NG-fired dual-cycle power plants built in New England, some replacing the capacity of coal-fired plants and one nuclear plant taken off-line. Some customers have seen their electric rates go up by 40% to 50% for the winter in anticipation of the rise in natural gas prices.

One would think that a proposal for a new natural gas pipeline through parts of southern New Hampshire would be met with approval. You'd be wrong.

Reading some of the articles and watching the news reports, I have to conclude the virus that causes overly emotional NIMBY (Not In My Back Yard) and BANANA (Build Absolutely Nothing Anywhere Near Anything) responses has infected the populace in some of those towns. Over-the-top 'reasons' for opposing the pipeline appear to dominate, including how the pipeline will adversely affect drinking water and that all of the natural gas will be sold overseas, just to name two. (While the second complaint almost makes sense, one has to remember that there are no natural gas cryo facilities in New Hampshire or Maine which are needed to supercool the gas into liquid form for shipping in LNG tankers. The only such facilities capable of doing this on the East Coast are located in Everett, Massachusetts, just north of Boston, and that facility has been closed for years.)

One has to wonder who will scream the loudest if the pipeline isn't built and electric rates skyrocket again or rolling blackouts are required because of the lack of natural gas to generate electricity? If Ihad to guess (and I will), it will be those same folks protesting against the pipeline.

If people are going to protest such a pipeline, I would find them far more credible if they were arguing against it based upon facts and evidence that such a pipeline would cause the problems they say it will. But basing their dissent upon an emotional response makes their protests ring hollow.


Related to the story above, a local politician - a representative to the New Hampshire House - discussed the pipeline protests, talking about how his town voted 419-1 to oppose the pipeline. Despite his personal belief that it might be a good thing, he stated he will do the bidding of his constituents and propose legislation that will make such a pipeline more difficult to route through his town.


Has the release of the Senate CIA torture report backfired on the Democrats?

After reading this, I'd have to say it has.


It seems California is battling the worst whooping cough epidemic in 70 years.

An epidemiologist with the state's Department of Public Health doesn't attribute the epidemic to the lower rate of vaccinations but rather that the existing vaccine is not nearly as effective as past vaccines.


And that's the news from Lake Winnipesaukee, where Christmas is less than two weeks away, folks are being frugal with their gift-giving, and where people are nervously eying their wood piles.

They First Make Mad

| | Comments (1) | TrackBacks (1)
This piece is timely considering my previous post.

It seems we have been inundated as of late with contradictory and paradoxical claims about cause and effect, human motivations, and plain history. That has been part and parcel of the Obama Administration, the Democrat Party, and the Catastrophic Anthropogenic Global Warming alarmists, just to name a few. Call it the perfect storm of insanity, something visited upon them by the Gods in order to eventually destroy them. My only qualm about it is that these nutjobs just might take the rest of us with them when they finally implode.

It used to strike me as impossible for global warming to cause cold weather.  Then I realized that I could chill a soft drink in the oven if there were no room left in the refrigerator to bake a cake.

Up until then I did not know that the same cause can have opposite effects.  In my unenlightened state, it never occurred to me that carbon dioxide could cause both excessive heat and excessive cold, both drought and flood.

After all, we calm hyperactive children with stimulants and cure addiction to drugs with addicting drugs.  When the government goes too far in debt, it borrows more money.   We achieve diversity through uniformity.  We overcome racism with racism.  When children don't learn, we send them to schools that don't teach.  We question authority by believing the authorities.

Barack tells looters and arsonists that he too is angry.  Michelle tells single mothers on welfare that she too has it rough.  Heads they win, tails we lose.

Obama thinks that siding with our enemies against our friends will leave us with no enemies and lots of friends.  Hillary Clinton thought that the way to protect Benghazi was to send security away and hire people who hate us.  Whom the gods wish to destroy, they first make mad.

The last part is due to Obama's willingness to ignore history, which has shown us appeasing enemies merely encourages them to make even greater demands, or worse, goads them into even more hostile acts because they know we won't fight back. Even children come to understand that standing up to the playground bully ends the bullying and abuse. Too bad for us Obama and his administration never learned that lesson.

...the scientific establishment believes, or at least pretends to believe, that warm weather, cold weather, floods, and droughts are caused by carbon dioxide released into the air by the burning of fossil fuels, that, in other words, human beings control the weather.  They think that we can prevent the climate from changing on a planet that has had billions of years of changing climates.

Of course, these scientists believe that hot, cold, wet, and dry are great evils, more deadly than nuclear warfare and nerve gas attacks according to the Secretary of State, who for some bizarre reason is in charge of pipeline safety, and they believe that enemies of science deserve the blame for these evils, implying thereby that the reverence once reserved for God belongs to Tea Partiers, Pro-Lifers, Fundamentalists, Big Oil, Texans, Red Staters, the One Percent, Sarah Palin, and Rush Limbaugh.

Carson forgot to mention the Koch Brothers, the supposed source of all evil in America. (So believes my brother-in-law, who didn't care that during the mid-term elections that multibillionaire Tom Steyer spent more than an order of magnitude more money trying to keep the Democrats in power than the Koch Brothers did to unseat them.)

Unfortunately I have run into more than a few of the "true believers" of that stripe. No amount of evidence, facts, or direct observations will sway them from their self-contradictory beliefs. Their entire belief system is based upon sound bites from biased MSM outlets and cribbed from talking point memo-type propaganda campaigns. No real facts or evidence need apply. It doesn't matter that even plain logic dictates their beliefs are based upon overt falsehoods. Hence the only explanation is that they have become mad, quite mad, I tell you!

That many of these types of folks populate government and, even worse, our schools and colleges, means this madness can spread. (It's the only reason I can think of that explains the push for Common Core, something that has no redeeming value and leaves our kids incapable of reasoning or thinking critically.)
The King James Bible made a notable error and the stipulation in the Ten Commandments has been commonly understood incorrectly.  Dennis Prager explains why it should be "Thou shalt not murder" instead of "Thou shalt not kill," a faulty translation from the otherwise magnificent 1611 Standard Version translation.

As a teacher in a minor seminary, I run into this misunderstanding continuously. Correcting it is like emptying the Atlantic with a stout ladle. It has gotten tiresome.
Searching through old entries on View from the Right, I was reminded of eight-year-old lone-wolf Islamic rampages that I had forgotten. Since then, there have been many more like the failed car bomb in Times Square, the Bosnian teenager's attack in the Salt Lake City mall, and the beheading in Oklahoma City. I'm sure there are many, many more. They need to be grouped together and classified as they aren't terrorism per se.

As Auster teaches, they are despicable acts that form a key tactic in Islam, the raid or razzia. Islam, as instructed in the Koran for its practitioners to slay the unbeliever wherever they find him, is an even worse doctrine than Hitler's Mein Kampf. It's profoundly misleading to consider Islam solely a religion, when it's also a legal system (Sharia).

In her farewell column this week, Diana West opines correctly that Dutch pol Geert Wilders, a present-day Winston Churchill, almost alone speaks the truth on Islam. He's our dim star of hope in the West. Mrs. West has fought heroically against liberalism and looking back, realizes she has utterly failed. So have many of us.

Michael H. Hart's 1978 book, reprinted and slightly changed in 1992, says Mohammed is the first of the 100 most influential people in history, a ranking that generated a lot of push back. But Hart was--is--unquestionably right. He's a very, very smart man. (The three smartest men I've ever met are in order: 1) Michael Hart; 2) Richard Epstein; and, 3) Charles Murray.)

"The Koran is more extreme than Mein Kampf" startling notion is something I was first taught by Michael H. Hart in his exchange with Lawrence Auster at the end of the latter's speech in 2009 at the Preserving Western Civilization Conference.

This is the terrifying prospect that we will continually be facing in ever increasing numbers as we permit more Muslims to enter the country or be converted in mosques and prisons. For those of us inhabiting Planet Realism as opposed to Planet Liberalism, we have been falling headlong for several decades now, prompted by the radical egalitarian belief, to national suicide. We won't last much longer, far shorter than Rome did.

Magnesium, the Cure-All?

| | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0)
Eat your lima beans and oatmeal and bananas, WP readers. This is good stuff.

I recently purchased a juicer to eat more spinach and other veggies, which has helped with my health. I get a lot of exercise but I often eat poorly, with a pronounced family history of worrisome alcoholism. Time to turn the corner since my exercise covers up a multitude of sins.
I am almost embarrassed I've never read _Animal Farm_ by George Orwell until this week. It was better than I had expected.

Re-reading his _1984_ voluntarily as an adult as opposed as a high-schooler also vastly exceeded my expectations.

So when I encounter another Animal Farm-type politically manufactured truth like this NAACP official explaining black crime, which is 25X higher for black-on-white crimes than the other way round, I realize in contemporary America black lives matter more, MUCH more, than white. Whites can be murdered for the most grotesque reasons--here and here are two top-of-the-mind examples--and the commentariat in the lame stream media willfully avoids covering it.

The truth of black dysfunction is the primary need of conservatives to trumpet in order to put progressives on the defensive, to stop whites from the ongoing national suicide, to rehabilitate our civilization from the aggressive onslaughts brought on by cultural marxism. This type of thought process that embraces white self-sacrifice to the Other, non-white, is perfectly illustrated in Anderson Cooper's reaction to his ancestor's brutal murder by one of his twelve slaves.
A little something for all those Star Trek fans out there while I work on a more serious post.

George Santayana's axiom about history still rings true: Those who ignore history are doomed to repeat it.

It seems we have been ignoring history and are once again entering a perilous time. What is looming before us is the possibility of war.

Writes Victor Davis Hanson:

The world is changing and becoming even more dangerous -- in a way we've seen before.

In the decade before World War I, the near-100-year European peace that had followed the fall of Napoleon was taken for granted. Yet it abruptly imploded in 1914. Prior little wars in the Balkans had seemed to predict a much larger one on the horizon -- and were ignored.

The exhausted Austro-Hungarian and Ottoman empires were spent forces unable to control nationalist movements in their provinces. The British Empire was fading. Imperial Germany was rising. Czarist Russia was beset with revolutionary rebellion. As power shifted, decline for some nations seemed like opportunity for others.

The same was true in 1939. The tragedy of the Versailles Treaty of 1919 was not that it had been too harsh. In fact, it was far milder than the terms Germany had imposed on a defeated Russia in 1918 or the requirements it had planned for France in 1914.

Instead, Versailles combined the worst of both worlds: harsh language without any means of enforcement.

The subsequent appeasement of Britain and France, the isolationism of the United States, and the collaboration of the Soviet Union with Nazi Germany green-lighted Hitler's aggression -- and another world war.

America's diplomatic and military strength has waned, not because of our country's inherent weakness but because our leaders wanted it that way, assuming that by appeasing our enemies that they wouldn't hate us any more. But history shows that appeasement encourages our enemies to take more drastic measures because they know we aren't likely to stop them. All one needs to do is look up Neville Chamberlain to see how well his efforts to appease Adolph Hitler worked to stem the tide of war. (Hint: It didn't. It merely bought a few months time for Nazi Germany to complete their preparations for the invasion of Poland, kicking off World War II.)

We are allowing weak adversaries to dictate terms to us as if by doing so they'll make nice. They won't. They will demand more, and if we don't give it to them, they'll take it by force. Think Putin's moves on Ukraine along with his threats to Latvia, Lithuania, Estonia and previous actions against Belarus and Georgia. What did we do? Nothing. China is also becoming more aggressive, as is Iran. This despite the fact that even with our shrinking military we are far stronger than any of them.

Should war come and we end up on the receiving end, we will only have our own leaders to blame, with a lion's share going to President Obama for all his efforts to cripple the US all in the name of some deluded idea of "fairness". (Not once has TOTUS ever explained what he means by "fair". I have a feeling it's far different from anyone else's.) The problem is that should war come, he won't be able to explain to the millions of dead why he sacrificed them all in the name of some twisted ideology that has no relation to reality.

| | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0)
"Everyone needs beauty as well as bread, places to play in and pray in, where nature may heal and give strength to body and soul." ~ John Muir

Thoughts On A Sunday

| | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0)
Yet another snowfall blanketed New Hampshire, though not to the extent it had prior to Thanksgiving. We did lose power, but only briefly. This time it wasn't caused by falling tree limbs but by a traffic accident just down the road.

Snowblowing the 3+ inches was problematic seeing as the snow was very wet and heavy, something the Official Weekend Pundit Snowblower didn't handle all that well. (We had to replace one shear pin and clean out the clogged discharge chute over a dozen times.)

With the sun out today we got some more melting of the ice/frozen slush left after clearing the driveway.

I'm just hoping this isn't setting the pattern for snowfall for the rest of the winter, something my grandfather always talked about. He was firm believer the first couple of snowfalls indicated the pattern of storms for the rest of the winter. If that is indeed the case then this is going to be a long arduous winter.


It's not surprising to me that the White House has refused to release any documents relating to the IRS targeting conservative groups for 'special' scrutiny. After all, the Obama Administration has a lot to hide.

This from an administration that touted itself as "one of the most transparent presidencies in history." The Nixon White House was more transparent than this administration, and that's saying something.


Mary Landrieu can add a new title to her collection: ex-US Senator.

Landrieu lost her runoff election against GOP challenger Bill Cassidy, losing by almost 12 percentage points, handing the Republicans a solid 54 seat majority in the US Senate.


I have to agree with many who think the only way to rein in the federal government overreach is for the state legislatures to wrest power away from Washington, exercising their Ninth an d Tenth Amendment rights, and if need be, call for an Article V constitutional convention.

Washington needs to be reminded that it serves us and not the other way around.


In line with what I wrote above, I think we should consider adding a Sunset Committee to Congress whose sole purpose will be to review all older legislation and programs and decide which of them are no longer germane, duplicative, or are at cross-purposes with other laws. It will then create a list of those laws and programs and generate legislation to "sunset" them, i.e. repeal the no longer needed laws or shutdown the useless or redundant programs. A number of states have them, so why not the federal government? (New Hampshire used to have just such a Sunset Commission, but it did away with itself some time in the late 80's. I think it's time to bring it back.)


Glenn Reynolds comments upon the fake UVA gang-rape scandal and links to previous posts and comments about how college campuses are now hostile environments for males. Some of his previous posts date back to 2002, so it isn't as if this anti-male hostility on campuses has sprung up just recently.


There seems to be some truth in this.

"Contemporary liberalism is a scheme for the already affluent and influential to increase their power."

In other words, Liberalism is a hoax.

Liberal myths propagated to generate outrage and activism, to organize and coordinate and mobilize disparate grievances and conflicting agendas, so often have the same relation to truth, accuracy, and legitimacy as a Bud Light commercial. Marketing is not limited to business. Inside the office buildings of Washington, D.C., are thousands upon thousands of professionals whose livelihoods depend on the fact that there is no better way than a well-run public-relations campaign to get you to do what they want. What recent weeks have done is provide several lessons in the suspect nature of such campaigns.

Then again, most of the American people have known that for a long time.

(H/T Eric The Viking)


It seems an Arizona police officer was recorded on video "brutally attacking" a 15-year old girl during a traffic stop.

The problem?

The video tape in question shows no punches being thrown by the officer despite claims to the contrary by the girl's mother and the person who recorded the video.

So who are we to believe? Our lying eyes watching the video tape or the two 'witnesses'?


Regular readers know I have no love for labor unions, particularly in light of my almost 20-year membership in one. It appears I'm not the only one who feels animosity for unions, particularly their own unions. This is particularly true of public-employee unions.

In Wisconsin it has become evident that 15,000 teachers have no love of their union, with 25 more unions decertified by their 'members' votes. When the unions are nothing more than a fund-raising organ of one particular political party (Hint: it isn't the GOP), their reason to exist is gone. They really don't represent the rank-and-file and as such shouldn't expect to retain any loyalty of their members. Once the union members had the power to decide whether or not their union should survive, a lot of them saw decertification as a path to freedom and took it.

If others are given the opportunity I expect to see similar results.


I've put off my annual flu vaccine, not because I didn't think I needed it but because I just plain keep forgetting to get it. Now it looks like I probably won't bother this year because the vaccine that is available is a poor match of this year's flu virus.

Each year epidemiologists make educated guesses about which flu strains will be making the rounds. For the most part they get it right. Just not this year.

The season has only just begun, but 91 percent of the approximately 1,200 samples tested thus far are of the H3N2 subtype of influenza A, Dr. Frieden said. Almost all the rest were influenza B. There were almost no samples of the H1 subtype, a descendant of the 2009 swine flu strain.

Years in which H3 subtypes are more common than H1 subtypes tend to lead to more hospitalizations and deaths.

Moreover, about half of those H3 subtypes -- or about 45 percent of all the samples tested so far -- are of a new H3 subtype that this season's flu vaccine does not protect well against.

The new subtype showed up early this spring and in the US early this fall. That meant there wasn't any time to create an updated vaccine so we're stuck with the one we have.

Great. I guess I'll have to do like Glenn Reynolds has suggested and lay in a supply of Tamiflu.


And that's the news from Lake Winnipesaukee, where the temperatures are plummeting, more snow is forecast for the middle of the week, and where we're already getting a good case of snow fatigue...and it's not even yet.
The guy wins elections by being a GraniteGrok-type of conservative/libertarian in Wisconsin of all places. Much to the dismay of the Huffington Post. There's a more vibrant conservative breeding ground in that state than in the Granite State. How did the state historically famous for its Progressivism become so? Talk radio. Charlie Sykes and a handful of others. Second, blacks behaving very badly in Milwaukee makes whites more leery about voting for the liberal cause that seeks to dismiss conservative analyses of lax policing, family dysfunction, lack of accountability of schools, etc.

White liberals in NH don't life close to a ghetto slum rife with gunfire. Yet. It's easier to act all anointed and superior.

Here Grothman, who's attacked Head Start for not working long term, brings to light how much poor people receive in government handouts. He claims a figure, which turns out to be true in states like NH and Vermont, but not quite accurate for Wisconsin. Instead of $35K in total contributions, it's only about $29K. The liar!

But give Grothman credit. He certainly is hitting the libs hard, knocking them back onto their heels, creating a much better dialogue for a conservative. A conservative on the attack with liberals having to respond and admitting, well, he's basically right, time and time again. Would any NH pol be willing to be so upfront, principled, and courageous? Donna Sytek? Jeb Bradley? Jasper the Democratic Ghost?
The response by Heartiste is tremendous by my reckoning, bringing in the full spectrum of angles that are assiduously ignored by the Stalinist horizontal censorship of the herd.

Why hasn't the Duke Lacrosse Rape Hoax made a bigger impact on the culture? Especially since the FBI statistics show white males raping black females is essentially occurring zero times per year. KC Johnson and Stewart Taylor wrote a very good book (I did come across more than the usual typos, though) that has been almost completely ignored.

As any male should know, he is guilty until he can miraculously prove his innocence in these informal harridan star chamber proceedings substantially lacking due process, something now mandated by the feminist feds, instructing a 51% preponderance of evidence to prove guilt. So a he-said, she-said scenario the tie often goes to the accuser.

UNH had an early example of this sexual mccarthyism at work with a freshman basketball player having what could only reasonably be determined as consensual sex in 1990/91 with a female classmate. Next morning, however, she felt wrong about it--the alcohol had worn off--and was likely encouraged to attack him with a rape allegation by the forceful womyn in charge of kangaroo court proceedings, apparently a lesbian who was eager, according the evidence and my experience with her, to put males in their place, and who is still aggrieved many years later a 22-year-old knocked her off her comfortable university perch. That would be me. I feel for you, Barb. Listen from 0:40 to 1:00 minute. See below the fold for more of this brouhaha.

Anyway, Steadman had to hire a lawyer, spend over $10K, and win in a real court of law. Steadman v. University of New Hampshire, 90-E-229, Strafford County Superior Court, filed Feb 13, 1991.

Polite language not used.
Since the mid-term elections, our local Progressives have been going out of their minds. Or perhaps it would be more accurate to say their mental states have deteriorated even farther than most of us even thought possible.

One of our more vocal and emotional progressive academics has deteriorated to the point where he is no longer able to differentiate between reality and the delusions from which he suffers. This delusional state has him libeling an entire group of people he doesn't know, has never met, and will never lower himself to meet. (Then again, he's an leftist academic, and in his mind no one with contrary viewpoints can ever offer him insight into the real world.)

His latest target: the Tea Party.

Not all conservatives, even extreme conservatives, can be called fascist. However, the Tea Party and similar movements which have infiltrated even traditionally moderate state Republican parties often possess certain characteristics that make may make them the closest thing we have seen to an American fascist movement in decades.

I don't know about you, but I am not aware of any "fascist" movement that wants the government to leave the people alone, to follow the law, not spend money it doesn't have on things the people don't want, and to perform the function it is supposed to. But then, fascist is a term used by this close-minded jerk to describe anyone who dares to disagree with his totalitarian ideology.

Like many on the Left, he accuses his opponents of deeds and actions that he himself would have no problem supporting as long as they were used against those he saw as "enemies of the state", in this case the state as defined by Marx, Lenin, and Stalin. How do I know this? Because of his false accusations about Tea Party activities.

The Tea Party has not yet taken to extreme acts of violence. But, why is the movement arming itself?

He implies the Tea Party has already resorted to violence, just not "extreme acts of violence." But he doesn't cite a single act of violence committed by Tea Party members. Not one. And the reason why he won't is because there are none.

More than a few people responded to this crank's claims, showing for the jerk and propagandist he is.

One suggested that if he really wanted to find out what the Tea Party was all about that he should attend a meeting. His response: silence.

Another suggested he check the definition of fascism in the dictionary as it was quite evident he didn't have a clue what it means. That's a surprise considering he's an academic. His response: silence.

Another dinged him one the lies told by his fellow travelers in support of Obamacare. His response: silence.

Yet another reminded him that most people merely want life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, a concept that appears to be foreign to this academic jerk. He also sets this fellow straight, slamming him for his derogatory and libelous language. But what does he expect from a willfully ignorant, indoctrinated drone incapable of expressing an opinion that wasn't programmed into him by his progressive handlers?

A Ferguson Truth

| | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0)
Received via e-mail:

Ferguson Truth.jpg
We always complain when the price of oil goes up, seeing how it affects the price of gasoline and heating fuels, and by extension, the cost of everything else. But there are those who bemoan the falling price of energy, not because they are oil producers but because they have done everything they can do to artificially raise the cost of energy.

Who are "they"?

The White House, of course.

While it seems that we will never run out of oil, something that is anathema to Obama's push to price energy until it is out of reach of everyone not in the top 10% "for our own good", the glut in oil supplies is driving prices down and causing ripples across the world's economy. In the US, lower oil pries and expanding supply have put immense pressure on the bio-fuel industry, making it less attractive economically and an expensive alternative to a cheap, plentiful fuel. It will continue to require government mandates to remain viable even though there is no real need for its existence.

Elsewhere, the drop in oil prices is putting the squeeze on governments dependent upon oil revenues for funds. One of those now in financial trouble is Russia, which requires oil to be at $100 per barrel in order to assure it will have the money to fund the government. With oil under $70 per barrel, Russia's government is in trouble. Iran is also in similar financial straits, as is Venezuela. (Venezuela's problems go beyond the drop in oil prices, with one of the biggest being the fall-off in oil production due to its failing petroleum infrastructure.)

Lower prices may also affect the dollar's power since there appears to be a shift away from the dollar as a pricing measure for crude oil. Some of this is driven by the sanctions laid upon Russia and Iran, which means they have great incentives to find ways of not using dollars for their oil sales. The rest may be laid at the feet of the US Federal Reserve's monetary policies that have made the dollar less attractive as a reserve currency.

It will be interesting to see what the lower prices will do to the shifting power structures throughout the world.

Thoughts On A Sunday

| | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0)
It's taken days but most of the power has been restored to the over 200,000 homes left without it after the Great 'Day Before Thanksgiving Day' Nor'easter. We were fortunate that our power was out for inly 2 hours. Others didn't have theirs restored until today.


Deb and I have been cleaning up around The Manse, continuing with both the post-Thanksgiving Day cleanup and our continuing fall cleanup. That has included cleaning the oven (it really stinks when we run the cleaning cycle) and finishing the last of the dishes before they are returned to their owners or to storage in one of our kitchen cabinets.

A trip to the dump and the recycling center helped do away with a the piles of unserviceable bits and pieces we've accumulated. We are also gathering clothing we no longer wear because they are too big, too small, or just unwanted, and will be bundling them off to the local Goodwill. Some last shoveling and snowblowing also opened the ground for some melting over the next few days.


I find it hypocritical the media is slamming RNC staffer Elizabeth Lauten for posting comments about Malia and Sasha Obama's reactions during the annual Turkey Amnesty, yet remained absolutely silent when the DNC and the media went after Sarah Palin's kids with a viciousness that took many people by surprise, including many Democrats.

It just yet another example of the double standard and an indication that much of the media are merely Democrat operatives with bylines.

What Lauten wrote was a mild rebuke. The abuse heaped upon the Palin children was orders of magnitude worse than that.


This quote brought me up short:

"How come looters never steal work boots?"

By way of Maggie's Farm.


Ashe Schow reminds American radical feminists of Five Things To Be Thankful For As A Woman In America. For sure most, if not all of those things would be denied them in places like the Middle East and the Asian sub-continent.


For those who have been paying attention, it's no surprise that more Americans than ever are delaying medical treatment due to the skyrocketing cost of health care caused by Obamacare. This was not an unexpected side-effect of the misnamed Affordable Care Act.

The hardest-hit: the middle-class. Americans with an annual household income of between $30,000 and $75,000 began delaying medical care over costs more in 2014, up to 38 percent in 2014 from 33 percent last year; among households that earn above $75,000, 28 percent delayed care this year, compared to just 17 percent last year.

It isn't just affecting the cost of treatment but the cost of pharmaceuticals. In the past 18 months I've seen the cost of one particular pharmaceutical increase by over 121%. When I asked our pharmacist why the cost had gone up so much, she stated that all the drugs of that type had gone up because of certain provisions of the ACA.


David Starr adds his 2¢worth about the rising costs of health care in the US, showing we aren't getting our money's worth and why. He offers four solutions to the problem. I happen to agree with all of them.


Oh, yay! Yet another hate hoax at one of our institutions of higher learning.

I expect the perpetrator will be severely dealt with...or not. At least previous perpetrators of these types of hoaxes have not had anything more than an admonition from the administrators of those colleges not to do it again.

(H/T Pirate's Cove)


This doesn't bode well for fast food workers in the US.

Due to a labor shortage in Singapore, one restaurant is using robots to fill the jobs normally taken by humans, in this case delivering food orders to their patrons.

How long before US restaurants start doing the same thing, but in this case to replace very expensive and overpaid waiters and other food service personnel?


The New England Patriots lost to the Green Bay Packers in Green Bay, 26-21.

It wasn't a blow out and the Patriots managed to seriously limit Green Bay's ability to score touchdowns from the red zone. In the end the Patriots didn't get it done.


And that's the news from Lake Winnipesaukee, where power has been restored, the madness of Black Friday has subsided, and where all of the Thanksgiving visitors have departed for home.

| | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0)
"The world makes way for the man who knows where he is going." ~ Ralph Waldo Emerson
When there's a shooting in which multiple people are killed, it's always especially distressing to learn of the fact that someone could have stopped it--but was not permitted to do so by prohibition. One of these days there'll be a successful lawsuit against these dangerous gun-free zones and the people who enable the murderous. Those places that disarm the law-abiding seem to attract the crazed evil lunatics who want a handful of minutes of uninterrupted killing, don't they? People ought to consider violating the law to save a life. Or two or three. Most of these areas don't have pat-downs or metal detectors.

New Finds

Expatriate New Englanders

Other Blogs We Like That Don't Fit Into Any One Category



Powered by Movable Type 4.1